首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficiency of hair snares and camera traps to survey mesocarnivore populations
【2h】

Efficiency of hair snares and camera traps to survey mesocarnivore populations

机译:圈套器和相机陷阱对中食肉动物种群的调查效率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mammalian carnivore communities affect entire ecosystem functioning and structure. However, their large spatial requirements, preferred habitats, low densities, and elusive behavior deem them difficult to study. In recent years, noninvasive techniques have become much more common as they can be used to monitor multiple carnivore species across large areas at a relatively modest cost. Hair snares have the potential to fulfill such requirements, but have rarely been tested in Europe. Our objective was to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of hair snares for surveying mesocarnivores in the Iberian Peninsula (Southwestern Europe), by comparison with camera-trapping. We used an occupancy modeling framework to assess method-specific detectability and occupancy estimates and hypothesized that detection probabilities would be influenced by season, sampling method, and habitat-related variables. A total of 163 hair samples were collected, of which 136 potentially belonged to mesocarnivores. Genetic identification success varied with diagnostic method: 25.2 % using mitochondrial CR, and 9.9 % using the IRBP nuclear gene. Naïve occupancy estimates were, in average, 5.3 ± 1.2 times higher with camera-trapping than with hair-snaring, and method-specific detection probabilities revealed that camera traps were, in average, 6.7 ± 1.1 times more effective in detecting target species. Overall, few site-specific covariates revealed significant effects on mesocarnivore detectability. Camera traps were a more efficient method for detecting mesocarnivores and estimating their occurrence when compared to hair snares. To improve hair snares' low detection probabilities, we suggest increasing the number of sampling occasions and the frequency at which hair snares are checked. With some refinements to increase detection rates and the success of genetic identification, hair-snaring methods may be valuable for providing deeper insights into population parameters, attained through adequate analysis of genetic information, that is not possible with camera traps.
机译:哺乳动物的食肉动物群落影响整个生态系统的功能和结构。但是,它们的空间需求大,偏好的栖息地,低密度和难以捉摸的行为使它们难以研究。近年来,非侵入性技术变得越来越普遍,因为它们可以以相对适中的成本用于监视大范围内的多种食肉动物。圈套器具有满足此类要求的潜力,但很少在欧洲进行测试。我们的目标是通过与相机诱捕技术相比较,来定量评估圈套器在调查伊比利亚半岛(西南欧)中食肉动物中的有效性。我们使用了一个占用模型框架来评估特定于方法的可检测性和占用估计,并假设检测概率将受到季节,采样方法和与生境相关的变量的影响。总共收集了163个头发样本,其中136个可能属于中食肉动物。遗传鉴定成功率因诊断方法而异:使用线粒体CR的占25.2%,使用IRBP核基因的占9.9%。单纯使用相机诱捕的朴素占用率平均要比用头发缠住高出5.3±1.2倍,并且特定于方法的检测概率表明,相机诱集装置在检测目标物种方面的平均效率要高6.7±1.1倍。总体而言,很少有特定于站点的协变量显示对中食肉动物的可检测性有显着影响。相机陷阱是一种比较有效的方法,用于检测中食性食肉动物,并与网状诱捕器相比,可以估计它们的发生。为了提高头发圈套器的低检测概率,我们建议增加采样次数和检查头发圈套器的频率。通过进行一些改进以提高检测率和成功进行遗传鉴定,通过对遗传信息进行充分的分析,头发诱捕方法对于深入了解种群参数可能是有价值的,而相机陷阱是无法做到的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号